Revista de Administração Revista de Administração
Ethics Research

RAUSP Management Journal | Ethics in Publishing

  • RAUSP Management Journal strives for the highest ethical standard in its evaluation process, not admitting cases of misconduct, either by Editorial Staff or Authors.
  • All Authors, Editors and Reviewers are encouraged to study and follow the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics - COPE ( at all stages of the process.
  • All suspected misconduct that comes to light will be investigated by the Editor-in-Chief under the highest standard of accuracy, until its clarification. On the other hand, corrections, clarifications, retractions and notes of concern will be published where appropriate.
  • When submitting articles for review, the authors should always:
    • Observe the criteria of attribution of authorship with the inclusion solely of those researchers involved in the research and not including as co-authors names that have not participated in the study;
    • Quote and reference correctly all data and interpretations of data from other publications;
    • Report any potential conflicts of interest of all authors;
    • Report all sources of funding;
    • Submit for publication only original articles, ensuring that all data are truthful and authentic, and have not been submitted to any other publication;
    • Give retractions or corrections of errors, when prompted by the publisher.
  • Reviewers, when receiving an invitation to review an article, must commit themselves to:
    • Decline the invitation if they have any potential conflicts of interest;
    • Perform the review themselves, with the best possible accuracy;
    • Accept invitations only when they are able to perform the review within the stipulated period;
    • Report on relevant articles published and that were not mentioned;
    • Maintain strict confidentiality about the articles reviewed, do not discuss them with colleagues, or use information to their own benefit until the publication of the article.
  • The Editors should always:
  • Strive to ensure peer reviews as impartial as possible;
  • Ensure the anonymity of reviewers;
  • Assess and investigate all suspected or confirmed cases of misconduct and/or breach of ethics;
  • Do not allow that financial interests may compromise the ethical standards of the publication;
  • Make sure that no plagiarism and misleading data are permitted.
  • Please see our information pages on Ethics in publishing and Ethical guidelines for journal publication.

    Cookies Policy
    To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.